Monday, January 19, 2015

What dreams may come. Reflections on Dr. King

( dug this out of my email archives... it was a draft of an internal company communication for 2013, meant to commemorate the 50 year anniversary of the March on Washington... this version never survived the committee editing process... but a few friends have thought it was decent, so I figured I'd share )

I'm writing on behalf of Black@TW to let you know that today marks the 50th anniversary of the historic March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom here in the U.S.


The first thing I want to do is ask you not to read the rest of this email... not right now anyway... much better would be to spend a non-billable hour doing the following:
  1. Reading Wikipedia's comprehensive and imho balanced entry on the march (estimated time: ~45 minutes, but I'm a slow reader)
  2. View the Rev. Dr. Martlin Luther King Jr.'s full I Have a Dream speech ( time: ~17 minutes )
By doing these two things, you'll have much greater knowledge of this event than the average American, and you'll be able to make an informed choice about whether the rest of this email is worth your time :-)

Go ahead, I'll wait...

... you back?  Cool!  And why might the rest of this email be worth your time?

[ warning, the opinions expressed below are solely those of Cliff and not necessarily those of Black@TW or any other TW person or entity ;-) ]

The "standard narrative" is a simplification

The standard narrative about The March on Washington typically goes like this:

On a hot August day in 1963, 250,00 people peacefully assembled in our Nation's Capital to hear Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. deliver his famous 'I Have a Dream' speech.  The March on Washington had a major influence on the passage of the Civil Rights act in 1963 and the Voting Rights act in 1964.


I think most observers would agree that this description is factual.  And I get it, narratives that last need to be simple.  My issue is not with the facts, but it's with the connotation of inevitability, magic, and divine providence that this simplification supports & promotes.  This was destined to happen, right?  On August 28th, there was this spontaneous gathering in the Capitol on the side of justice and righteousness.  A great historical figure gave a kick ass speech and then we passed the Civil Rights Act... yay! (yes, that was sarcasm)

Because you read the Wikipedia entry, you already know that this march was in no way predestined.  There were active attempts to prevent it.  The PA system was sabotaged the day before the gathering.  There were extensive compromises made so that the event could go forward, speeches were edited so as not to provoke the powers that be... if you don't believe me, ask John Lewis.  You know that the National Mall's Park Police were in position to cut the audio if they deemed it necessary ( see that uniformed white guy next to Dr. King during his speech? ) You know that even in this time, the Black community did not necessarily speak with one voice, with Malcolm X being a key critic.  

Why is the "destiny" implication an issue for me?  Because the tacit assumption that "sooner or later, things will just work out", is morally lazy at best, and an abdication of each of our personal responsibility at worst.

Another simplification is that the march was "The Dr. Martin Luther King show".  Again, I get it.  It is a really kick ass speech... one of the best ever.  King's prodigious oratory skill combined with a mass media capable of broadcasting this into "every home in America" certainly had an impact... I would never deny that, and I'm thankful for it.

But, because you've read the Wikipedia article, you know that the march was "coordinated" by multiple organizations and their leaders (known as the "big six").  You also know that the nitty gritty organizing and coordination was overseen by by Bayard Rustin, a gay black man who will posthumously receive the Medal of Freedom today from the President.  You also know that Rustin worked with several hundred volunteers in Washington D.C. and hundreds more around the country to pull off the event.

The point:  Dr. King deserves every bit of praise and admiration he receives for seizing that moment and helping us all see what is possible for this nation,  but it's important... no, critical to remember that he was just 1/250,000th of the story on that day.

Our common historical recollection "shifts the frame" towards the land of feel-good

Again, I blame this on the greatness of the back half of the speech.  Because you watched the entire speech, you notice how most contemporary "looks back" on this day focus on the final 7 minutes or so, where Dr. King is looking forward and articulating his "dream".  As many times as I've seen the speech, it still gives me goosebumps.  I get why we would focus on this.... it's ridiculously inspiring.

However, if you widen the frame to the full speech, you know that Dr. King spends just as much time talking about where Black people stood in that moment, and it wasn't pretty. He spoke of obligations that America had yet to meet.  "Checks returned marked 'insufficient funds' ".  He talked about "rude awakenings" that lay in store if the Nation did not follow a path towards justice and righteousness.  He also implored Black folks not to quench their thirst for justice by drinking from the cup of hatred... what does it say about those times, our history as a nation, that he needed to implore us so?

That was then...

Fast forward 50 years... how much progress towards justice and righteousness has been made?  I want to pause here and make a comment about the coverage of this anniversary in the media... they ask the same question I just asked:  How much as changed in the last 50 years?  But again, there's an implicit message that this march should have changed so much more.  Marches and speeches can inspire individuals, they can threaten power structures, but they cannot in and of themselves effect real and lasting positive change... I think we're seeing that in other global contexts in the present, sadly.

All of that to say, I don't ask "where are we today?" with the assumption that The March on Washington should get all the credit nor all the blame...

So, where are we today? (imho)

The Good
  • Symbolic political progress:  Obama's election is the obvious one.  A fair number of African American cabinet members over the past few decades, even in Republican administrations ;-)
  • (relative to pre-civil rights act, a little bit of ) Economic progress:  in 1965, things *really* sucked for Black folks economically, today they suck a little bit less. (See "the bad" below)
  • Some progress on reducing education, employment, and residential discrimination - Anecdotes: In the late 60s, in order to get to her newly integrated honors high school, my mom had to dodge dogs let out by residents of the White neighborhood between her house and school.  In the 80s, I went to an integrated, middle class public high school where we had very few racial issues.  in 1974, my Dad was able to get a job as a Systems Analyst with IBM in part due to their active efforts to hire minority candidates (which they did as a way to avoid antitrust action, but still...) I write this email after having put my biracial daughter to bed in the moderately affluent (but predominantly white) Chicago suburb in which we live.  I feel a consistent low level of isolation living out here, but the schools are good, and no one is throwing bricks through my window.  That's actually progress. But there's some serious discontinuity of even this progress when you look at different socio-economic strata within the Black community.
  • Moving towards parity in base-level educational attainment:  In 1960, Whites graduated high school at twice the rate of Blacks.  Today, while there's still a gap, it's much smaller.  [ Image | Source ]
The Bad
  • Not enough economic progress by a long shot!
    • Income:  Since 1965, the gap in median income between Whites and Blacks as been remarkably consistent.  One could interpret this as the U.S. having made no progress towards income parity.  [ Image | Source ]
    • Wealth:  Even as the income gap has held steady, the White/Black wealth gap as widened, with Black wealth trending very flat.  Wealth parity is getting worse [ Image | Source ]
    • Tenuous upward mobility:  According to one study, Blacks born into middle class families in the 1960s had a 45% likelihood of sliding down to the "lower class" as adults.  Whites, by comparison, had a 16% likelihood. [ Source ]
  • Educational attainment gap widens after High School.  [ Image | Source ]
  • Despite Legislation, High levels of segregation persist (De Jure, De Facto, Po-tay-to, Po-tah-to...)
What can I do?

Something symbolic you can do is ring the online Freedom Bell today at 3pm.

As far as more substantive actions... remember that funny story from The March?  The "big six" were late because they were meeting with members of Congress, so The March started without them!  They eventually caught up to take a picture "leading" the people :-)

What do you think  you can do? The one thing I know you don't have to do is wait.

Saturday, January 10, 2015

India Bound...


Heading to India for a bit... a good excuse for some "visual remixing"

Here's the album cover for the soundtrack to Bollywood Action film "The Burning Train"


This cover was remixed by Stones Throw for Madlib's "Beat Konducta in India Vol 1."  can you spot Madlib?


I re-remixed the Stones Throw cover... can you spot me?


Heaven help us all if I actually ever obtain some real photoshopping skillz :-)

Thursday, January 8, 2015

Cataloging!




And so it begins continues...

The collection will be cataloged in 2015!  [ Full digitization is a multi-year effort we'll worry about later ;-) ]

Saturday, October 18, 2014

Did "Heather's Party" send you here?


You can stay here if you want to read my blog...

You can go to the link below to check out some mixes of mine... see you Friday :-)

http://cwcr.podomatic.com

Sunday, February 16, 2014

Thoughts on 12 Years a Slave

Went to see Steve McQueen's 12 Years A Slave the other day.  Before seeing it, I posted this on social media:

About to see 12 years a slave, which is this movie fan's equivalent of "eating your vegetables". It will no doubt be "good for me" and I might even "enjoy" it. But I'm dubious and generally off-put by the need to do it.

There was a decent amount of discussion on the post.  With some folks being of the "nah, I'm not seeing it" opinion and others saying it was a film that needed to be seen.

Here's my executive summary:
  • The movie is excellent, it is a work of art of a very high order.
  • If I had it to do over again, I wouldn't see it.  I'm not of the opinion that anyone needs to see this film specifically.
This is the first film of McQueen's that I've seen.  He is a true auteur… he tells a powerful story.  The performances in the film are top notch.  [film geekery] There are some badass long takes, great sound design and other such stuff going on in the film. [end film geekery]

To talk about why I wouldn't see it again, I must first say that I had no plans to see it at all.  It was nothing specific to 12 Years..., I just don't like paying money to feel sad.  Here is a select list of "important" films I've never seen, and have no particular plans to see:
  • Schindler's List
  • Precious
  • The Act of Killing
  • The Onion Field
  • The Impossible
I'm also not inclined to spend money on any number of Magic and/or Numinous Negro films, such as:
  • Shawshank Redemption
  • The Green Mile
  • The Legend of Bagger Vance
  • The Blind Side
  • etc.
Not criticizing any of those "important" films, they're just not usually my bag.  There is an implicit critique of the Magic Negro stuff… but that is fodder for a different post ;-)

So, why did I need to see 12 Years?  I made a commitment to see it because a respected actor friend of mine said the film had "changed cinema" and implored me to see it so that we could discuss/argue about it at a later date.  I am a man of my word, if nothing else :-)

As I said above, it is an excellent film.  But in my assessment, it hasn't done anything to foster a more meaningful understanding of slavery than did the TV miniseries Roots 30+ years ago.  I want to stress here that to say 12 Years is as good as Roots in that regard is very high praise in my book.

I've been thinking about what's behind the impulse to believe this or that film "needs to be seen".  As it relates to the subject matter covered by 12 Years A Slave, it doesn't take much insight to see that the core sentiment that's really being expressed is that:

  slavery and its impact need to be truly understood by all Americans

And, seeing films such as 12 Years a slave may be useful steps towards that ultimate goal.    

I wholeheartedly agree that slavery and its impact need to be truly understood, but I'd set up a different syllabus for people interested in a journey towards that understanding.

Cliff's "Journey towards understanding" syllabus

History
Today
I know others might have a different syllabus in mind and I'd welcome those comments.

Dramatizations such as 12 Years, Roots, or what-have-you, while powerful, and possibly useful as a step towards greater understanding, are at their heart entertainments.  As substantive as they might want to be, they are limited by the primary goals of entertaining.

And not to put too fine a point on it, but I'm supremely uninterested in engaging substantively with anyone who hasn't done at least 50% of the homework I enumerate above (or something similar).  In the realm of substance, all seeing 12 Years might do is allow a viewer to say very emphatically and with heartfelt emotion, that slavery sucked.  To which my reply would be: "Why yes.  Yes it did."




Thursday, August 29, 2013

Classic Material: Michael Jackson - P.Y.T


P.Y.T. is my favorite Michael Jackson song.  You should pause for a moment to consider what I just said...  Yup, this is my favorite.  I'd expect any reader to accept, a priori, that this is an awesome song... but why is it my favorite among a looooong list of awesome MJ songs?  We'll get to that.

First, though, we need to talk about the tiger.  In addition to its numerous distinctions, Thriller has the honor of being the best non-Ohio-Players gatefold cover ever.  That white suit?  The casual-yet-oh-so-fly Gordon Gartrel lookin' black shirt?  A baby tiger?!? In all of our combined lives and efforts, it's highly unlikely that we'd approach that level of fly...


Musically, why is it my favorite?
  • great contrast between the airy synth pads of the intro and the boogie of the main song
  • great bass line, with the main part of the phrase being stolen from another artist[1], but in the best way.
  • great music arrangment, with an artful layering and interweaving of the various elements over the course of the song.  Listen to the rhythm piano that's present only in the first verse as the instrumentation builds.  Listen for the bongos over the course of the song. Wow.  Produced by Quincy Jones, so, duh.
  • great vocal arrangement. quick... how many pop songs can you name where there are key changes in the backing vocals?  The chipmunk backing vocals in the final few bars?!? Bananas.
  • I'm not even going to talk about the breakdowns, we'd be here all day...

As with most classic material though, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.  I remember being at a Four Barrel coffee in San Francisco's Mission District a while back.  Man, this place was hipster!  But the head Barista (who gets the honor of selecting tunes during the shift, I believe) was playing Thriller.  Yo, every toe in that place was tappin' and every head was bobbin'.  If there'd been one other black person besides me, a dance party might have even broken out.
Head Barista at Four Barrel gets it poppin' with P.Y.T.
So yeah, P.Y.T is my favorite MJ tune.  However, I also like the demo version of the song, which is similar only in title to the album version.  Here's the U-Tern Edit.  I also like what Kanye did with the chipmunk vocals on his track Good Life, which is notable for being the only track on which T-Pain is tolerable to my ears.

Footnotes

1 - PYT's bassline during the verses before the bridge is lifted almost directly from Carl Carlton's She's a Bad Mama Jama (She's built, She's Stacked), which was released in 1981, just a year before Thriller.  The truth of the matter is that every artist "steals".. being influenced by other artists, and sometimes appropriating these influences. One wonders if there might be a Robin Thicke/Pharrell style controversy around PYT were it to be released today.

Saturday, December 15, 2012

Screw Homicide, let's talk about Heart Disease!


Actually, what I have to say is (hopefully) more nuanced and useful than my headline implies :-)

This started out as a Facebook post as I wanted to respond to the voices I saw filling up my screen in reaction to the tragic shootings in Newtown, Connecticut.

Humans are hardwired to try to explain things, and when tragedies such as this occur, the impulse kicks into overdrive.  It's a club I wish I didn't belong to, but as someone who's lost a young relative to violent crime, I *can* imagine what they're going through in Newtown, and my thoughts are with them in ways that would take too long to express in a FB or Blog post.  So, where I go to try to "make sense" of things after events like this is the aggregate data.  Some facts:

  • of the 15 major causes of death that the CDC tracks, Homicide ranks 15th (with about 16,000 homicides in 2009)... and this level has held steady for about the last decade
  • of Homicides, "mass homicide" deaths have averaged about 150, also holding steady for the last decade
  • Heart disease, the #1 cause of death, took about 600,000 lives in 2009, two orders of magnitude greater than homicide, 3 orders of magnitude greater than mass homicide

Ok, so what?  Well, I guess this info, particularly the trend data, helps stop me from going down the road of "things are getting worse" thinking.  This is not say that "things are just fine".  My personal opinion is that guns are too easy to get. ( Heart disease was definitely not the top cause of mortality for young men in Chicago this past summer. )  We should have a debate on Gun Control, or "Gun Rights", if you prefer.  But I'm dubious that anything short of UK Style restrictions would have much impact on homicide rates.  Again, that's not say we shouldn't consider that, but it's politically untenable.

And perhaps, more importantly, looking at the aggregate data, I think it's awesome that we can move forward on less contentious issues, such as helping our kids be more active and eat more healthily, and really make a difference as it relates to our "top killers".

Sources:

Crime Statistics since 1960: http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm

CDC Mortality data for 2009 (table on page 5): http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr60/nvsr60_03.pdf

Information of "Mass Homicide" Rates: http://www.npr.org/2012/12/14/167287373/many-mass-killers-have-had-chronic-depression